About Art

Sh. Yanovsky

1906

A. Leopold,

It would appear from your letter that you do not believe that art is a factor in civilization and progress. You are not the only one. One might agree with you that up to now no statue or picture has turned anyone into a revolutionary. But that does not render art invalid. One thing is certain: each artwork is the expression of someone’s especially strong feeling and thought. Is that alone not enough? We do not belong to those who subscribe to the idea of “art for art’s sake.” Nevertheless, we can very well admire a picture, even if it does not express any revolutionary thought, for the beauty, harmony, and creative energy that are found in it. Moreover, art also has its place in the development of revolutionary ideas. For example, the war pictures by the great painter [Vasily] Vereshchagin have greatly contributed to antiwar sentiment.

Translated by
Solon
Beinfeld
.

Credits

Sh. Yanovsky, “Vegn kunst” [About Art], Di fraye arbeter shtime, Jan 13, 1906. Republished in Abba Gordin, ed., S. Yanovsky: Zayn lebn, kemfn un shafn, 1864–1939 (Los Angeles: S. Yanovksy Ondenk-Komitet, 1957), p. 576.

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 7.

Engage with this Source

You may also like