Exodus and Revolution

Michael Walzer

1985

I

Since late medieval or early modern times, there has existed in the West a characteristic way of thinking about political change, a pattern that we commonly impose upon events, a story that we repeat to one another. The story has roughly this form: oppression, liberation, social contract, political struggle, new society (danger of restoration)…

Please login or register for free access to Posen Library

Already have an account?

Engage with this Source

From the Curator

The Exodus story created the paradigm of a moderate political revolution that enables communities to overcome oppression through political struggle over time and eventually leads to the creation of a new society. But gradually, oppressive forces return and the process repeats itself. In contrast, Walzer argues that the Exodus story also has a second pattern, what he calls an “offspring.” In this messianic paradigm, there is the possibility of a radical end to the slow historical progression of change. Walzer highlights how post-1967 Zionism adopted this messianic politics and, with it, moved toward an absolute politics that clashes with the message of the Exodus narrative.

Discussion Questions

Can you think of examples in recent political movements in your home country from both typologies of political change?
Why do you think that the messianic narrative emerged to challenge the dominance of what Walzer calls the Exodus political paradigm?
Does this interpretation of Exodus change your understanding of Jewish politics—either in the United States or in Israel?

Details

Exodus and Revolution

I

Language:

Places:

Categories:

Subjects:

You may also like

Exodus and Revolution

I

Creator Bio

Michael Walzer

Language:

Places:

Categories:

Subjects:

You may also like

The Institute for the Study of Jewish Communities in the East

Eternally Waiting

Self-Portrait